Commercial model under validation

Start with the work.
Scale with the proof.

A focused engagement first. Recurring software after the value is measured. Clear scope, visible assumptions and no invented certainty.

Start a design-partner conversation No checkout. No patient data. No obligation.

One starting point.
Three paths from there.

The ranges below come from the current commercial model. They are planning hypotheses, not validated market prices or a promise of availability.

For one post-acute or community rehabilitation facility

Facility

Planned after a validated pilot
$2k–$5kper facility / month · indicative range

The expected recurring model for supported claim-pricing and appeal-review workflows after the wedge is validated.

  • Value measured per facility—not per generic seat
  • Ongoing supported rule evaluations
  • Evidence-linked appeal drafting with human review
  • Claim ingestion and production workflow are not live
Validate facility fit

For billing-team learning with synthetic cases

Trainer

Individual preview live · teams planned
$50–$100per learner / month · indicative team range

Case-based onboarding and reviewer-readiness practice. Individual synthetic preview access remains free today.

  • Synthetic cases only—no patient information
  • Payer-context grading with visible rationale
  • Team identity and progress reporting are planned
  • Not an AAPC credential or recognized certification
Discuss team learning

For multi-site providers and specialist RCM agencies

Network

CustomScope provider and agency workflows separately

No public percentage or standard enterprise term. Sites, eligible claim volume, services and recurring software are scoped independently so outcome revenue is not presented as ARR.

Discuss network fit

Compare the model.
Including what is not ready.

Availability status is part of the product—not fine print.

Scroll horizontally to compare all offerings

Comparison of indicative BioCareful offerings
CapabilityRecovery ReviewFacilityTrainerNetwork
Current statusScoping onlyPlannedIndividual preview liveFuture custom scope
Intended buyerProvider finance / billing leadFacility revenue-cycle leaderBilling manager / educatorNetwork or specialist agency
Commercial modelPilot fee + contingent componentPer facility subscriptionPer learner subscriptionNegotiated by workflow
Value metricReviewed claim populationFacility workflow coverageActive learnersSites, volume and scope
Patient data on public siteNot acceptedNot acceptedNot acceptedNot accepted
Executable payment scope todaySupported Michigan no-fault logicNot yet a production workflowSynthetic answer keysNot yet available
Human reviewRequired in any pilotRequired in planned workflowEducational rationaleDefined in written scope
Team identity & progressNot includedNot includedPlannedPlanned by engagement
Claim ingestionNot publicly availablePlannedNot includedPlanned
Appeal draftingPilot deliverable to be scopedPlannedNot includedPlanned
Outside MichiganNot for payment reviewFuture rulebooksGeneral synthetic learningFuture rulebooks

Trust before scale

The proof is in
what we can show.

01

Supported rules carry citations.

The Michigan no-fault engine returns the authority behind supported evaluations. Draft educational content remains visibly Draft.

02

Same complete input. Same result.

Reproducibility requires fixed facts, a rule version and a legal as-of date. Missing information means review—not invented certainty.

03

The model does not make the rule.

Our planned production architecture limits AI to evidence extraction. Deterministic rules decide supported outcomes. Production AI is not live today.

04

People remain accountable.

PHI processing is disabled in the public preview. Any future claim export requires qualified review and the appropriate safeguards.

Questions worth asking

Plain answers.
Before any agreement.

What am I actually buying today?

Nothing self-service. This page previews packaging for design-partner conversations. Individual Atlas and Trainer access is free. Any paid engagement requires a written scope, safeguards, deliverables and commercial terms.

What data do you need—and does it include patient information?

The public pricing and design-partner pages collect no patient information. A business conversation starts with your workflow and goals. Any future claim review would require separate authorization, agreements, a secure data path and explicit scope before data is received.

What happens if a Recovery Review finds nothing?

Recovery is not guaranteed. The written pilot would define the review population, pilot fee, contingent terms and what happens when no supported discrepancy is found. No generic policy has been adopted yet.

How long does implementation take?

There is no standard implementation promise. Timing depends on the agreed workflow, data readiness, security requirements, rule coverage and review process. A written pilot scope would establish milestones before work begins.

Who reviews the output?

Current public content is Draft educational material. Any production engagement would name the qualified human reviewers, their scope and approval responsibilities in writing. No autonomous claim export is available today.

Can I cancel?

The public preview is free. There is no standard subscription contract today. Pilot termination and any future subscription cancellation terms would be stated in the applicable written agreement.

Is this available outside Michigan?

The educational Atlas and synthetic Trainer have broader relevance. The executable payment engine currently focuses on Michigan auto no-fault. Additional post-acute, workers’ compensation and state rulebooks are roadmap items—not current coverage.

Start with a business question

Let’s price the work
after we understand it.

Begin the conversation No patient data. No checkout. Commercial terms require a written agreement.
Pricing preview — BioCareful